RE: Could an omnipotent and omniscient god prove that he was God?
January 22, 2023 at 3:47 pm
(This post was last modified: January 22, 2023 at 3:49 pm by Objectivist.)
(January 22, 2023 at 2:12 pm)emjay Wrote:(January 22, 2023 at 1:48 pm)Objectivist Wrote: Emjay,
Thank you so very much. You don't know how happy I am to hear your words. My mission is complete. I set out to get one person to take an honest look at these ideas. There is a system, the most beautiful system and you have only seen a tiny fraction of it. I am glad that you are seriously interested in philosophy again. No man or woman can live without one. I think the reason these ideas have resonated with you is that you can see their relevance to your life unlike post modern philosophy. Do you mind if I copy your words and send them to Dr. Valient? I think they would make him happy. He has lots of videos on youtube. I urge you to watch more. His name is James valiant.
You have made my day and my month and my years. Thank you.
Hey there,
Sorry, I wasn't expecting this sort of response... you're welcome
I saw that guy in that video... very animated... do you know him personally then, if you're wanting to sent a copy of my post to him? It's your call of course but I'd prefer you didn't... there's nothing profound in anything I've said, and tbh I don't see what's so controversial about this, that you'd have so much difficulty getting anyone to take it seriously. I mean obviously I haven't learnt the finer points yet, but the general message... or one of many... that logic cannot be, or shouldn't be, separated from facts (ie reality), if I'm understanding that right, seems pretty intuitive to me in hindsight.
Hi Emjay,
No, I don't know him personally and I will respect your wishes. I just know him from his videos. I know it would make him happy and proud that something he said got somebody interested in philosophy. I don't know what's so controversial about it either, but it is. I've been called every name in the book for expressing these ideas and just the other day someone on this forum called me a sociopathic cultist.
"Do not lose your knowledge that man's proper estate is an upright posture, an intransigent mind, and a step that travels unlimited roads."
"The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see."
"The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see."




... do you know him personally then, if you're wanting to sent a copy of my post to him? It's your call of course but I'd prefer you didn't... there's nothing profound in anything I've said, and tbh I don't see what's so controversial about this, that you'd have so much difficulty getting anyone to take it seriously. I mean obviously I haven't learnt the finer points yet, but the general message... or one of many... that logic cannot be, or shouldn't be, separated from facts (ie reality), if I'm understanding that right, seems pretty intuitive to me in hindsight.