RE: Abortion-Killing: The Silent Genocide: 2 Billion Deaths Victims Worldwide.
July 10, 2023 at 8:26 am
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2023 at 8:27 am by Angrboda.)
Here, let me point out the equivocations by inserting the appropriate qualifiers in your text:
[insertions mine]
Now that the appropriate qualifiers have been added such that the term in premise #1 is the same as that in premise #2, we can see that premise #2 is clearly false as a child in the womb is most definitely not a born human being, therefore premise #2 is false and your argument is unsound.
By the way, I can do this all day long without breaking a sweat. Your arguments are not new or clever and my logical skills are easily equal to the task.
(July 10, 2023 at 8:10 am)Nishant Xavier Wrote: Angrboda, and also anyone else, on the Abortion issue:
The argument really is very simple, I: (1) All [born] Human Beings have All Human Rights (2) The Child in the Womb is a [born] Human Being (3) Therefore, the Child in the Womb has All Human Rights. (4) All Human Rights include the Right to Life, otherwise you and I don't have that Right either. (5) Therefore, the Child in the Womb has the Right to Life. It has this simply by virtue or by Nature of being Human, which we can now medically prove. Not just of course the fact that the Child in the Womb has a beating human heart proves that, but even some time earlier, it was medically known, the child in the womb is a new human being, genetically distinct from each of her parents, having 23 chromosomes from both.
[insertions mine]
Now that the appropriate qualifiers have been added such that the term in premise #1 is the same as that in premise #2, we can see that premise #2 is clearly false as a child in the womb is most definitely not a born human being, therefore premise #2 is false and your argument is unsound.
By the way, I can do this all day long without breaking a sweat. Your arguments are not new or clever and my logical skills are easily equal to the task.