Why did Communists promote Evolution?

[Deesse23]

@Nishant

 Descendants of the ape, lol. Reminds me of what Piers Compton documented in the Broken Cross, which I'll cite in a minute. Btw, if any of us are actual descendants of the ape (we aren't), then, logically, it would follow, some of our descendants could be apes as well. This is what Evolutionists in Evo-Devo call "Devolution". Wiki: "Devolution, de-evolution, or backward evolution is the notion that species can revert to supposedly more primitive forms over time." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devolution_(biology)

And if anyone actually thinks human beings will give birth to apes again one day, he/she is kidding himself/herself. Yet this is what evolution/devolution would lead to. All these fallacies/sophisms come from failing to distinguish Accidental and Essential/Substantial Changes. The difference between Apes and Human Beings is an Essential/Substantial difference. It is never going to be traversed just by throwing in even billions of years if you want. Now, the difference between different kinds of humans - different genetic properties of those who are and remain biologically and genetically human beings - is an accidental difference. Only these kinds of differences will take place through natural selection. Humanity did not evolve from apes, which is to say apes did not give birth to humans. Neither will humans ever devolve to apes; those are all similar evolutionist errors.

These two paras are enough to amply demonstrate that you simply don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Devolution is utterly discredited - there simply is no such thing. If it happened, it would require evolutionary processes to operate in reverse along exactly the same path (source: the Wikipedia article YOU linked). This is impossible, both mathematically and biologically.

Nothing in any evolutionary theory states, implies, or even hints at apes giving birth to humans. By saying these startlingly ignorant things, you're not actually attacking evolution - you're attacking what evolution isn't and never has been.

Read through those TalkOrigins links I gave, as well as other articles on that site. It behooves you to learn more about evolution, if for no other reason than to stop making an ignorant ass of yourself where everybody can see.

Boru

I concur, the fool has ab-so-fucking-lutely no idea what he is talking about.

Also from the article HE linked (bolding mine)

The idea of devolution is based on the presumption of orthogenesis, the view that evolution has a purposeful direction towards increasing complexity. Modern evolutionary theory, beginning with Darwin at least, poses no such presumption,[1] and the concept of evolutionary change is independent of either any increase in complexity of organisms sharing a gene pool, or any decrease, such as in vestigiality or in loss of genes

Its breathtaking how often this dumbass uses the word "logic" and tries to calculate stuff, yet he is posting exclusively unreasonable BS and is applying math completely wrong to anything he is rambling about.

Its so bad, it almost smells like *sniff* *sniff*....like poe.