RE: Why did Communists promote Evolution?
July 27, 2023 at 9:09 am
(This post was last modified: July 27, 2023 at 9:16 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
(July 27, 2023 at 8:13 am)Angrboda Wrote:It was science that exposed Peltdown man as science corrects itself and this guy's desperate attempt to treat this as if it was some vast conspiracy against his religion is freaking hilarious. And the idea that scientists needed Pelt down man to argue for evolution and against creationism is also dumb. Also, the idea that it was buried is also ridiculous Pelt down man has been talked about plenty since SCIENCE discovered it wasn't real and not his creationist kook. This guy's tinfoil hat really is on too tight. Also, the idea that teaching evolution in schools in Anti Christain is freaking hilarious.(July 27, 2023 at 12:47 am)Nishant Xavier Wrote: 3. Angrboda, as I mentioned and documented, some 250 publications for over 40 years used Piltdown Man to try argue against the Special Creation of the First Human Couple. They irrevocably destroyed the Faith of millions, for which they will have to give account to Almighty God. They falsely tried to use this as evidence in their Anti-Christian Scopes trial; they claimed it as the missing link for a long. And it was a Hoax! Then they quietly buried it as though nothing was out of the ordinary. This is like a Sherlock Holmes Murder Mystery. The people behind it are trying to kill not your bodies, but your souls. It's up to you to be wise enough to figure that out in time to go to Heaven. The evidence is clear.
Now, let me re-quote the salient excerpt from Williams around 1930: "While Wells says the bones of 100,000 horses were found in a single locality, Dr. Ales Hrdlicka says that the bones of 200,000 prehistoric horses were found in another place. Why should we not find, for the same reason, the bones of millions of ape-men and ape-women in 750,000 years? Instead of millions we have the alleged fragments of 4, all of which are of a very doubtful character."
In other words, Williams argues that the number of the alleged fragments of Piltdown man are so small - 4 instead of millions - that there's very good reason to believe there were not actual alleged ape-men over millions of years, and Piltdown man was a Total Hoax, as it was proven to be.
None of that demonstrates that Piltdown Man was a hoax. So your saying that he exposed the Piltdown Man as a hoax is just you telling more lies. I'm guessing that thou shalt not bear false witness is your favorite commandment as you honor it in the breach so often.
(And IIRC, Darwin answered Williams' objections long before he made them. Apparently, your Williams was an ignoramus.)
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM