Why did Communists promote Evolution?

[The Architect Of Fate]

Here is the Nature Journal: "The Book of Genesis puts Adam and Eve together in the Garden of Eden, but geneticists’ version of the duo — the ancestors to whom the Y chromosomes and mitochondrial DNA of today’s humans can be traced — were thought to have lived tens of thousands of years apart. Now, two major studies of modern humans’ Y chromosomes suggest that ‘Y-chromosome Adam’ and ‘mitochondrial Eve’ may have lived around the same time after all1,2." https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2013.13478

]Even your own cited article does not agree with your conclusion. All you have done here is cherrypick a line you think supports you and think were stupid enough to not bother to read the whole article.

I find this part very funny

. (The biblical reference is a bit of a misnomer because this Adam was by no means the only man alive at his time.)

Or this 

In February, for instance, researchers led by Michael Hammer, a population geneticist at the University of Arizona in Tucson, reported the discovery of an African American family whose Y chromosomes do not seem to directly descend from Adam's4. One possible explanation is that the Y chromosome came from an archaic species of human that interbred with Homo sapiens tens of thousands of years ago.

Also as Wikipedia points out 

The name "Mitochondrial Eve" alludes to the biblical Eve, which has led to repeated misrepresentations or misconceptions in journalistic accounts on the topic. Popular science presentations of the topic usually point out such possible misconceptions by emphasizing the fact that the position of mt-MRCA is neither fixed in time (as the position of mt-MRCA moves forward in time as mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) lineages become extinct), nor does it refer to a "first woman", nor the only living female of her time, nor the first member of a "new species".[note 4]

This was not the "first woman" as the bible it amazes me that you use a biblical reference and creationists somehow think you're confirming their myths.

Evolutionists still deny these were the First Couple of course, but at least they admitted they lived around the same time. Maybe in 25 more years they'll get it right, who knows. In the meanwhile, Rev. Williams was right on Piltdown Man 25 years before most Evolutionists, and we are right today.

Because they were not "the first couple " and living at the same time doesn't confirm anything. Also, you have yet to proven  Rev. Williams exposed anything, and even if he did it's irrelevant to the validity of evolution because evolution never relied on peltdown man