RE: The Electoral College
December 16, 2011 at 6:39 pm
(This post was last modified: December 16, 2011 at 6:40 pm by TheDarkestOfAngels.)
I'm a little bit torn on ths actually -
On one hand - I love democracy.
On the other hand - people don't always vote based on the person who represents their best interests - (see: congress - who attempted to pass three bills that would create an American Fascism - including internet censorship and the ability for the military to arrest anyone without a trial.)
So, I think a solution lies somewhere in between - like a system where both an electoral college and the majority of people elect a president based on the degree in which each voted.
For example, if 51% of the people in an EC votes for one guy and 52% of Americans voted for the other guy, the Americans would succeed in voting "other guy" into the presidency.
There would have to be a third-party intervention if the two groups voted oppositely in EXACTLY the same degree. I don't know who that would be, but I don't see this being an issue that comes up very often.
In a pinch, though, I trust democracy far more than an electoral college.
On one hand - I love democracy.
On the other hand - people don't always vote based on the person who represents their best interests - (see: congress - who attempted to pass three bills that would create an American Fascism - including internet censorship and the ability for the military to arrest anyone without a trial.)
So, I think a solution lies somewhere in between - like a system where both an electoral college and the majority of people elect a president based on the degree in which each voted.
For example, if 51% of the people in an EC votes for one guy and 52% of Americans voted for the other guy, the Americans would succeed in voting "other guy" into the presidency.
There would have to be a third-party intervention if the two groups voted oppositely in EXACTLY the same degree. I don't know who that would be, but I don't see this being an issue that comes up very often.
In a pinch, though, I trust democracy far more than an electoral college.
If today you can take a thing like evolution and make it a crime to teach in the public schools, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools and next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church. At the next session you may ban books and the newspapers...
Ignorance and fanaticism are ever busy and need feeding. Always feeding and gloating for more. Today it is the public school teachers; tomorrow the private. The next day the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the newspapers. After a while, Your Honor, it is the setting of man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth centry when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind. ~Clarence Darrow, at the Scopes Monkey Trial, 1925
Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. ~Ronald Reagan
Ignorance and fanaticism are ever busy and need feeding. Always feeding and gloating for more. Today it is the public school teachers; tomorrow the private. The next day the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the newspapers. After a while, Your Honor, it is the setting of man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth centry when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind. ~Clarence Darrow, at the Scopes Monkey Trial, 1925
Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. ~Ronald Reagan
