(September 8, 2023 at 1:00 pm)tackattack Wrote:(September 7, 2023 at 4:37 pm)FrustratedFool Wrote: Fair enough. So the ideals for man and woman are different.Your assumption and mindset are that there is an either or dynamic going on, which is incorrect. You can be a male with 100% nurturer as a trait and that has zero bearing on me identifying them as a “real man”. As I stated nurturer was not part of my definition of “real man”. you can be both a nurturer and a protector but they are not the same thing.
Men are primarily protectors, women primarily nuturers, in your view.
So a man who was far more a nuturer than a protector wouldnt be a real man, yes?
But I can't be a zero protector and 100% nurturer and be a real man, yes? But I could be that and be a real woman.