(September 14, 2023 at 10:10 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: NASA's Report on UFOs/UAP.
"At this point there is no reason to conclude that existing UAP reports have an extraterrestrial source."
https://science.nasa.gov/science-pink/s3...port_0.pdf
It's worth noting that NASA does not have access to anything new or classified. They're analyzing the same public data we can access, more or less. Bill Nelson literally said he got his information about Grusch and the UAP hearing from "watching the evening news."
I guess the report is fair relative to their supposed knowledge base? The report is essentially saying, "look we don't have all the data to conclusively prove anything but...this is exactly the type of tools: sensors, commercial/scientific satellites, data analysis techniques (ML) we'd like to employ in order to prove a future sighting." The only substantial piece of info in this report, IMO, is the analysis of the GOFAST video. They're claiming the object was only going 40 mph. I'd like to see analysis of GIMBAL and TICTAC.
But I really want to know why NASA doesn't publicly release the identity of their "Director of UAP Research."
![[Image: nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWT...dc2a24480e]](https://external-preview.redd.it/nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWTNVY.jpg?width=216&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=7b11e8b38bea0eacc8797fc971574ddc2a24480e)