Even if the Kalam were a sound deductive argument - which it isn't, because premise #1 is not verifiable and therefore cannot be said to be true - the most it could say is that at least one "causeless cause" exists. There is nothing inherent in the argument that supports the concept of a sentient cause, let alone a "divine" one.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 18, 2026, 6:05 am
Thread Rating:
|
The Kalam Cosmological argument.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


