Even if the Kalam were a sound deductive argument - which it isn't, because premise #1 is not verifiable and therefore cannot be said to be true - the most it could say is that at least one "causeless cause" exists. There is nothing inherent in the argument that supports the concept of a sentient cause, let alone a "divine" one.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: January 18, 2025, 2:55 pm
Thread Rating:
|
The Kalam Cosmological argument.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Am I a Deist? Cosmological Argument seems reasonable to me. | _Velvet_ | 97 | 19646 |
September 28, 2016 at 8:05 am Last Post: Edwardo Piet |
|
| WLC debated Sean M. Carroll a few weeks ago on origins and Kalam Argument | Mudhammam | 9 | 3435 |
April 5, 2014 at 7:09 pm Last Post: Mudhammam |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
