RE: Stupid things religious people say
August 26, 2024 at 6:12 am
(This post was last modified: August 26, 2024 at 6:14 am by Sheldon.)
(August 26, 2024 at 1:02 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: Scientists?Surely "could be authentic" is semantically the same as "could not be authentic"?
Otangelo is not a scientist but a troll.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/...rgery.html
So firstly they can only test how old it is surely, beyond that what might they test? The best they could hope for is that a new test dates closer to 2000 years ago than the middle ages, which was if memory serves the last result, would this fact alone be sufficient to believe in supernatural magic and deities? I have to say personally I would remain dubious. you'd only have a remarkably unlikely mystery you couldn't explain. They definitely shouldn't test it, they have everything to lose and nothing to gain, it seems to me.