(March 27, 2025 at 5:45 pm)Sheldon Wrote:(March 27, 2025 at 5:35 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: @TheWhiteMarten
ALL government actions require the redistribution of resources, you numbwit. It’s called ‘taxation’ and has been around for a minute.
If you want to object to your taxes helping to fund pre- and post-natal care, go right ahead and object to it. But bear in mind that your objection gives the lie to your claimed pro-child stance. You’re supporting an increase in miscarriage, sickly infants, infant death, and the death of women during childbirth.
Try thinking things through, you ignorant wretch.
Boru
To be fair, he never claimed to be pro child, just anti-choice, (for women at least), or pro-life as they like to misrepresent it. If there is a more a vacuous, and asinine claim, from people determined to increase the risk of fatalities during childbirth, and from poverty thereafter, I am not sure what that would be. They belong to a cult that literally celebrates the torturing to death of a human being, the irony is off the fucking scale.
I really shouldn't have opened that second bottle of wine...... but, if a job's worth doing...
To be fair, he claimed exactly that. Post 1885, this thread (bold mine):
Quote:Right; pro-birth simply meaning the successful birth of the human child and it's continued life - as opposed to the opposite, which terminates the pregnancy and thus the life of the child.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax