(March 27, 2025 at 11:17 pm)The Architect Of Fate Wrote:Quote:So the sins of a father do justify the blood of the son in certain cases?Nope it's simply a fact no woman should have to carry their rapists this isn't an issue of crime and punishment it's question of bodily autonomy she doesn't want to carry it full stop and no one has the right to force her too
Quote:Who gets to make those arbitrations?The women because she's carrying it and doesn't want to that's all that's required
"Simply a fact" is not an argument; the *reality* is that women *are* carrying their rapists children, hence the reason some opt for the choice of killing the child.
Encouraging abortions *encourages* rapists who now have to worry *less* about their DNA being linked to them later on, and it also encourages unsafe sexual practices and acts of "light" sexual coercion against near acquaintances and hookups - "Well, if I knock her up I can just arm twist her into getting an abortion." I'm sorry men exist like that but no amount of closing of eyes and wiping of our minds will make them disappear.
We need to teach women to defend themselves against rapists and teach men to be better men, not throw up our hands and pretend the problem doesn't exist. It will *never* solve itself and will *only* get worse, which seems to be what the perverts who run many of these movements want.
-----
So some victims of crimes do get to choose if the son is guilty of the sins of the father?