(March 27, 2025 at 10:35 pm)The Architect Of Fate Wrote:Oh I am dubious he thinks that at all, I think it was pure mendacity on his part. Rather than honestly address arguments that tear his own facile ravings apart like warm bread he is once again resorting to dishonest and vapid rhetoric.(March 27, 2025 at 6:44 pm)Sheldon Wrote: Wrong word,...I've underlined and emboldened it for you, try moving your finger more slowly over the screen, see if that helps you understand your straw man here. If that's too subtle note the word dehumanise is not in my post...lets try bullet points for you...Your dealing with some who thinks your purposing zygote or blastocyst are a separate species which is clearly a strawman. He's incapable of seeing the difference between something being genetically human and actually being fully human
1. The word dehumanise is redundant, since I was emphatically and explicitly rejecting your claim it is scientific that a blastocyst or zygote is a human being.
2. My description of a zygote or blastocyst is scientifically correct, I know, ironic right?
3. If it were a "human being" it would not justify granting it the right to use another human being's body against their will, even to survive.
4. Despite your rhetoric, this is not a right we ever grant anyone, so why would we grant it to a microscopic clump of insentient cells? Will you ever answer this I wonder? I don't really, I know from previous exchanges how dishonest you are.
Lies for Jesus, is quite a common tactic I have seen religious apologists indulge many times.