RE: Stupid things religious people say
March 28, 2025 at 6:15 am
(This post was last modified: March 28, 2025 at 6:16 am by Sheldon.)
(March 27, 2025 at 11:27 pm)TheWhiteMarten Wrote:The reality is that it is demonstrably not a child. Your relentless dishonesty in using such facile and emotive rhetoric, suggests your arguments are poorly reasoned.(March 27, 2025 at 11:17 pm)The Architect Of Fate Wrote: Nope it's simply a fact no woman should have to carry their rapists this isn't an issue of crime and punishment it's question of bodily autonomy she doesn't want to carry it full stop and no one has the right to force her too
The women because she's carrying it and doesn't want to that's all that's required
"Simply a fact" is not an argument; the *reality* is that women *are* carrying their rapists children, hence the reason some opt for the choice of killing the child.
Facts:
1. We don't let anyone use the body of another against their will.
2. Passing laws to tell women how, & when their bodies are used, takes away their bodily autonomy.
3. Taking away someone's bodily autonomy is the definition of enslavement.
4. Abortions involve a woman making a decision about what happens to her body.
5. Abortions in the vast majority of cases involve a blastocyst.
6. A blastocyst is a microscopic clutch of insentient cells.
Now for the subjective opinion, I don't care how you choose to define a blastocyst, as even if it were a 16 year old child, I still would not accept it had the right to use the body of anyone else against their will.