Stupid things religious people say

[Sheldon]

Cool; so what species does that blastocyst or zygote, microbic as it is, a clump of cells without sentience, belong to?

Oh so you're just going to roll past your lie that my factual statement describing a blastocyst, was rhetoric, I see. It says a great deal about your posturing here, that it requires constant sophistry, and outright duplicity. You also seem to have ignored a raft of questions, and my point about letting someone live by using the body of another against their will. Also the biblical references, and questions, all ignored. 

What species do your finger nail clippings belong to? Would you describe them as a human being? You claimed abortions involved killing children after all, that you either don't know, or don't care that this is an egregious lie, says it all. 

Now I will ask again, as you keep ignoring my question. You claimed abortions "denied a basic human right" "the right to life". Yet we never grant anyone the right to live, by using the body of another human being against their will. So if you think a blastocyst should have this right over the woman's body it is topologically connected to, and a part of, would you grant it to actual children after they are born, say forcing a father against his will to harvest his kidney to save the life of his child, if he was the only viable donor and refused to give it up?

The longer you dodge this question, the more I must infer that you realise your claim was facile rhetoric, but lack the integrity to acknowledge this fact, and the open mind to examine what that means for your position.

Now, do you think it was immoral when the deity you imagine to be real, tortured a newborn baby to death in the bible, or when it committed genocide using a global flood? Including all the pregnant women of course, so much for the notion you care about the "right to life".

I'm never getting any answers to these am I, is anyone really surprised.