KFC-eating YouTuber mocks ISKCON devotees in London: Deliberate act of Kafirophobia exposes deep Anti-Hindu hate
This was no accident. The entire incident appears to have been premeditated. The YouTuber walked into the ISKCON-run vegetarian restaurant with a bag of chicken from KFC, set up a camera, and began eating meat right at the counter fully aware that ISKCON strictly follows and promotes a sattvic, meat-free lifestyle in accordance with Vaishnava Hindu values.
What turned this from a violation into a hate act was his next move offering meat to Krishna devotees and recording their reactions. This wasn’t just a stunt for likes or a misguided prank. It was a calculated attempt to mock Hindu beliefs, provoke devotees, and test the limits of tolerance.
Vinod Bansal, National Spokesperson of the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), took to X, to express outrage over the incident, “Such misdeeds are not only an attack on Hindu sentiments but also a matter of behaving with dignity in someone else’s space,” said Bansal. “Will Mayor Sadiq Khan’s London Police act or let London continue its descent into ‘Londonistan’?”
Imagine the roles reversed. Had someone walked into a halal-only Islamic restaurant or a kosher Jewish space and consumed pork or beef on camera, the backlash — and media coverage — would have been immediate and fierce. Yet, in this case, mainstream British media and so-called secular watchdogs have remained conspicuously silent. Such acts are increasingly being viewed not as isolated incidents, but as symptoms of a growing intolerance against Hindus, often brushed aside under labels like “harmless prank” or “creative freedom.”
The video has triggered strong reactions from social media users, who have called it a blatant disrespect of the restaurant’s spiritual and cultural values. Amid calls for action against the man, several users also questioned why the Hindus did not stand up for themselves.
“Hindus can run away from India but will still get pushed around. We need to have shatrubodh and community unity. Then push back strongly,” a user said, adding, “Hindus have to act rough and tough.”
“This is the problem with Hinduism. Your benevolence is being taken as weakness,” said another user.
Another added, “Anyone can come and insult the religion, why can’t Hindus stand up for themselves and form a deep state of their own in the US just like the Jews did to influence US policies and decision making?”
“So why did not the COWARDLY HINDUS give him a SOUND THRASHING, eh?” asked an angry netizen.
“Walking into a temple canteen with chicken isn’t rebellion — it’s cultural illiteracy served with zero self-respect,” another added.
A few users also used Lord Krishna references while calling for an action against the man.
“Devotees should follow Lord Krishna's policy. Namely, being nice to sādhus, and kicking butt of all such dushtas. This blanket unconditional humility and submissiveness didn't work in Dwāpara, and definitely won't work in Kaliyuga. (It didn't work in Tretā either, btw)” a user said.
“Slit his throat right there. Even LORD Shri Krishna said... If they want WAR give them WAR,” added another.
A user also claimed that the act was purely done for a few likes on social media, and said, “These are insects in the society, doing anything to get engagement on social media and look cool. This is a virus that is going to destroy generations to come.”
https://organiser.org/2025/07/21/303775/...indu-hate/
https://www.livemint.com/news/india/gand...27458.html
This was no accident. The entire incident appears to have been premeditated. The YouTuber walked into the ISKCON-run vegetarian restaurant with a bag of chicken from KFC, set up a camera, and began eating meat right at the counter fully aware that ISKCON strictly follows and promotes a sattvic, meat-free lifestyle in accordance with Vaishnava Hindu values.
What turned this from a violation into a hate act was his next move offering meat to Krishna devotees and recording their reactions. This wasn’t just a stunt for likes or a misguided prank. It was a calculated attempt to mock Hindu beliefs, provoke devotees, and test the limits of tolerance.
Vinod Bansal, National Spokesperson of the Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP), took to X, to express outrage over the incident, “Such misdeeds are not only an attack on Hindu sentiments but also a matter of behaving with dignity in someone else’s space,” said Bansal. “Will Mayor Sadiq Khan’s London Police act or let London continue its descent into ‘Londonistan’?”
Imagine the roles reversed. Had someone walked into a halal-only Islamic restaurant or a kosher Jewish space and consumed pork or beef on camera, the backlash — and media coverage — would have been immediate and fierce. Yet, in this case, mainstream British media and so-called secular watchdogs have remained conspicuously silent. Such acts are increasingly being viewed not as isolated incidents, but as symptoms of a growing intolerance against Hindus, often brushed aside under labels like “harmless prank” or “creative freedom.”
The video has triggered strong reactions from social media users, who have called it a blatant disrespect of the restaurant’s spiritual and cultural values. Amid calls for action against the man, several users also questioned why the Hindus did not stand up for themselves.
“Hindus can run away from India but will still get pushed around. We need to have shatrubodh and community unity. Then push back strongly,” a user said, adding, “Hindus have to act rough and tough.”
“This is the problem with Hinduism. Your benevolence is being taken as weakness,” said another user.
Another added, “Anyone can come and insult the religion, why can’t Hindus stand up for themselves and form a deep state of their own in the US just like the Jews did to influence US policies and decision making?”
“So why did not the COWARDLY HINDUS give him a SOUND THRASHING, eh?” asked an angry netizen.
“Walking into a temple canteen with chicken isn’t rebellion — it’s cultural illiteracy served with zero self-respect,” another added.
A few users also used Lord Krishna references while calling for an action against the man.
“Devotees should follow Lord Krishna's policy. Namely, being nice to sādhus, and kicking butt of all such dushtas. This blanket unconditional humility and submissiveness didn't work in Dwāpara, and definitely won't work in Kaliyuga. (It didn't work in Tretā either, btw)” a user said.
“Slit his throat right there. Even LORD Shri Krishna said... If they want WAR give them WAR,” added another.
A user also claimed that the act was purely done for a few likes on social media, and said, “These are insects in the society, doing anything to get engagement on social media and look cool. This is a virus that is going to destroy generations to come.”
https://organiser.org/2025/07/21/303775/...indu-hate/
https://www.livemint.com/news/india/gand...27458.html
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
