RE: A general topic on "what started it all..."
July 10, 2009 at 2:51 am
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2009 at 3:05 am by Dharan.)
Darwinian, You have satisfied my question as to why 'nothing' doesn't exist (correct) and you have satisfied my question as to why if something exists, then something must have existed for all time (correct).
I cant yet see how you have addressed the question as to why something exists. Are you suggesting something must exist to satisfy its polar relationship to nothing (which cant exist)?
arcanus,
If science doesnt know, then why arent scientists more open minded toward religion? Is it easier to not know? than to go down the path of learning to 'know'?
I often hear scientists suggest that religion and science are seperate magisteria which do not interact. Yet scientists often start out christians and convert to atheism during the course of their studies. So there truly must be some interactions between the two paradigms
I cant yet see how you have addressed the question as to why something exists. Are you suggesting something must exist to satisfy its polar relationship to nothing (which cant exist)?
arcanus,
If science doesnt know, then why arent scientists more open minded toward religion? Is it easier to not know? than to go down the path of learning to 'know'?
I often hear scientists suggest that religion and science are seperate magisteria which do not interact. Yet scientists often start out christians and convert to atheism during the course of their studies. So there truly must be some interactions between the two paradigms
