Dharan Wrote:I cant yet see how you have addressed the question as to why something exists. Are you suggesting something must exist to satisfy its polar relationship to nothing (which cant exist)?
Something can't have a polar relationship with nothing because 'something' exists and 'nothing' is simply an intellectual construct or an idea.
Why have we got something and not nothing? Because we can't have nothing and we also can't have 'something' not existing.
But this still doesn't really answer the question. Perhaps it's unanswerable
I suspect it's all wrapped up with time. Without time, 'something' can't have existed, exist or continue to exist. Perhaps time is the canvas that 'something' needs. On the other hand, without 'something' then time has no meaning either.
Perhaps it's all to do with the observer. Does 'something' really exist if there is no-one to observe it?
Solipsism, here I come again hock: