'False Flag' Theory Dominates Online as FBI Warns California of Iran Drone Threat
Federal authorities have issued a stark warning to law enforcement agencies across the West Coast regarding a potential airborne strike. On 11 March, the Federal Bureau of Investigation alerted officials in California and neighbouring states about an alleged Iranian drone threat.
Thousands of internet users immediately questioned the legitimacy of the federal alert on social media. A lot of people started guessing that the impending threat was just a made-up crisis planned by Israeli intelligence. Before long, the phrase 'false flag' was trending online while everyone argued over the warning.
Now, both public figures and regular citizens are jumping online to share their doubts. For instance, former professor and Libertarian Party Mises Caucus member Michael Rectenwald took to X to share his perspective. He posted, 'If Iran attacks California, or if Mossad pulls a false flag in America, it's all because the US serves 'Israel'.'
Other users expressed similar disbelief. One individual stated, 'This is some BS. California didn't do anything. It's not Iran. This will be another Israel Mossad False Flag to blame on Iran. We are no longer Asleep. We know what it is.' Another sceptical voice added, 'Very difficult for me to read this as anything but a potential false flag set up im ngl.'
The online disbelief focuses on the tactical difficulty of launching an attack on the West Coast. Observers point out the vast geographical distance a hostile fleet would need to travel undetected to reach Californian waters.
Military analysts note that advanced unmanned aerial vehicles are sophisticated assets. Developing and deploying these remote systems can cost approximately £750,000 ($900,000) per unit. Sending expensive equipment across the globe on an unescorted ship seems improbable to many geopolitical commentators.
Social media commentators were quick to highlight recent naval losses that make such an expedition unlikely. One user articulated this tactical reality by stating, 'So after we destroyed their navy and sunk all their ships Iran is going to sail an unidentified vessel across the world (the long way) to launch drones at California... Righhhhtttt👍🏻.'
The bureau admitted a lack of precise operational details. The warning concluded by noting, 'We have no additional information on the timing, method, target, or perpetrators of this alleged attack'.
https://www.inkl.com/news/false-flag-the...one-threat
Federal authorities have issued a stark warning to law enforcement agencies across the West Coast regarding a potential airborne strike. On 11 March, the Federal Bureau of Investigation alerted officials in California and neighbouring states about an alleged Iranian drone threat.
Thousands of internet users immediately questioned the legitimacy of the federal alert on social media. A lot of people started guessing that the impending threat was just a made-up crisis planned by Israeli intelligence. Before long, the phrase 'false flag' was trending online while everyone argued over the warning.
Now, both public figures and regular citizens are jumping online to share their doubts. For instance, former professor and Libertarian Party Mises Caucus member Michael Rectenwald took to X to share his perspective. He posted, 'If Iran attacks California, or if Mossad pulls a false flag in America, it's all because the US serves 'Israel'.'
Other users expressed similar disbelief. One individual stated, 'This is some BS. California didn't do anything. It's not Iran. This will be another Israel Mossad False Flag to blame on Iran. We are no longer Asleep. We know what it is.' Another sceptical voice added, 'Very difficult for me to read this as anything but a potential false flag set up im ngl.'
The online disbelief focuses on the tactical difficulty of launching an attack on the West Coast. Observers point out the vast geographical distance a hostile fleet would need to travel undetected to reach Californian waters.
Military analysts note that advanced unmanned aerial vehicles are sophisticated assets. Developing and deploying these remote systems can cost approximately £750,000 ($900,000) per unit. Sending expensive equipment across the globe on an unescorted ship seems improbable to many geopolitical commentators.
Social media commentators were quick to highlight recent naval losses that make such an expedition unlikely. One user articulated this tactical reality by stating, 'So after we destroyed their navy and sunk all their ships Iran is going to sail an unidentified vessel across the world (the long way) to launch drones at California... Righhhhtttt👍🏻.'
The bureau admitted a lack of precise operational details. The warning concluded by noting, 'We have no additional information on the timing, method, target, or perpetrators of this alleged attack'.
https://www.inkl.com/news/false-flag-the...one-threat
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
