(January 8, 2012 at 10:07 am)amkerman Wrote: I am fully aware that my ability to convey understanding is lacking. I am not perfect and can not do ANYTHING perfectly. Furthermore, I get that I may sound preachy. I am arguing for truth. I will continue to argue for truth at my own peril. If you deny truth at the outset I will invariably sound preachy, like I am trying to force something on you. If I say the sky is blue and you say it is red and I persist, I will sound preachy. Unfortunately, I am not willing to desist in my assertion that the sky is blue until someone logically shows me how the sky is not blue and will continue offering argument to how the sky is blue and not red until i have convincing reason no longer to assert such. I am not arguing "why", I am arguing "how". I am not trying to get anyone to change their beliefs, I couldn't if I wanted to. I am simply trying to get people to understand the implications of having beliefs by challenging them through logical argument.
You are ignorant moron tend to slap the reality in face with "goddidit" fallacies without even intellectually analyze your own lack of knowledge in the logical argument, basic of definition and science.
Quote:Refusal to attempt at understand is ignorance.You fucking don't know what you are talking about. "Goddidit" is easy, ignorant way to comprehend something you don't understand.
