(January 9, 2012 at 10:56 am)amkerman Wrote: Exactly shell. I am the one arguing. In order to argue against me you must first understand me. To do this you must accept the definitions of words I have, not the other way around. You want me to adhere to your definitions, but your definitions are not what I am talking about. I am talking about my definitions.
I won't be accepting your redefined words. Such words have already been defined. You don't get to redefine anything.
If you can't accept that, then that's your problem.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
