Islam true religion?

[Cyberman]

William Lane Craig is respected. Why do you think many Theists reference his work?

Because they're so desperate to have their delusions reinforced they'll latch on to anyone with a glib tongue and a suit? Am I getting warm?

In that case, atheists also quote from Dawkins for same reasons you mentioned.

Except that Professor Dawkins (yes, he actually has scientific credentials) actually is a respected writer and speaker. Respect isn't something that comes automatically from standing at a lectern, nor is it gauged by how many people cite a person as a reference. It is earned, in this case by actually adding to the body of human knowledge through peer-reviewed literature and the like. Prof Dawkins has earned something else besides respect: credibility, which gives him the leeway to explore the subject of religion in his own methodical way. Atheists don't, as a rule, treat his every utterance as divine prophecy or holy writ carved in stone, forever unchangeable.

WLC, as has already been pointed out to you, is a proven liar and a known fool. Putting your faith in him is exactly what parables such as 'building your house on sand' were written about.

And if 'winning' a debate on an atheist forum, even one as august as this, is so gut-wrenchingly important to you, then I am truly sad for you.