Actually Zakir Naik has refuted this claim. Jesus was just showing his disciples not to worry because he was the way, truth and life like any prophet was.
John 14:6 means nothing. Zakir Naik has more knowledge than any Christian on their scripture.
What Gospel of John did you read? = John 5:30 where Jesus says he can't do anything by himself. That Gospel of John.
John 10:30 I and my Father are one.
First verses is a mistranslation because Unitarian Christians have refuted this. For sake of argument, it still doesn't prove he is god. It just says he pre-existed but we all did in god's foreknowledge.
John 8:58 = So? He just pre-existed how is that a claim of god.
John 10:30 = He is talking about purpose not entitiy. For example, say if me and my dad were doctors. I said me and him are one, I don't mean in essence but in purpose and profession. Same with Jesus (PBUH). For scripture evidence for this, go to john 17:21 where Jesus says him and disciples are one but I bet you won't clam they are god. Anyway, read John 10:34 where he denies this claim by saying it's normal if I claim to be god because other people claimed to be god in the OT which shows Jesus wasn't being literal.
As for Thomas, other people were called Lord. Why do you have to apply it to Jesus only.
In sum, don't use another religion's scripture to prove your own religion. = I can actually. My book tells me to go back to the Bible to see the truth and falsehood of it.
I said "allegedly". Many times in fact. I don't believe Jesus ever existed. If he did exist, we have no clue what the real story was. = But theres more evidence for him than Alexander the Great or any famous historical person.
I agree. I'm not talking about what I believe. I'm talking about what the official story is. = What's the 'official' story according to you.
Which we know how...? = Because his enemies said so. Also his companions.
John 14:6 means nothing. Zakir Naik has more knowledge than any Christian on their scripture.
What Gospel of John did you read? = John 5:30 where Jesus says he can't do anything by himself. That Gospel of John.
John 10:30 I and my Father are one.
First verses is a mistranslation because Unitarian Christians have refuted this. For sake of argument, it still doesn't prove he is god. It just says he pre-existed but we all did in god's foreknowledge.
John 8:58 = So? He just pre-existed how is that a claim of god.
John 10:30 = He is talking about purpose not entitiy. For example, say if me and my dad were doctors. I said me and him are one, I don't mean in essence but in purpose and profession. Same with Jesus (PBUH). For scripture evidence for this, go to john 17:21 where Jesus says him and disciples are one but I bet you won't clam they are god. Anyway, read John 10:34 where he denies this claim by saying it's normal if I claim to be god because other people claimed to be god in the OT which shows Jesus wasn't being literal.
As for Thomas, other people were called Lord. Why do you have to apply it to Jesus only.
In sum, don't use another religion's scripture to prove your own religion. = I can actually. My book tells me to go back to the Bible to see the truth and falsehood of it.
I said "allegedly". Many times in fact. I don't believe Jesus ever existed. If he did exist, we have no clue what the real story was. = But theres more evidence for him than Alexander the Great or any famous historical person.
I agree. I'm not talking about what I believe. I'm talking about what the official story is. = What's the 'official' story according to you.
Which we know how...? = Because his enemies said so. Also his companions.
