I find the request for evidence amusing coming from someone who claims we haven't discovered more than a thousand extinct species without a single citation to back it up. Of course, I wouldn't cite Ken Hamm or whoever he got it either.
More than 1,000 species are known to have gone extinct in just the last 400 years: http://www.conbio.org/resources/Education/faq.cfm
Also:
http://www.lassp.cornell.edu/newmme/scie...ction.html
An interesting book, if you're into that kind of thing: https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-revie...-bad-luck/
I know when 'Undeceived' says 'evidence' he means bodily show him millions of extinct species so he can count them himself, since he (despite his protests) despises scientists in the relevant fields and has been so misled by Creation Science that he thinks all scientists start with their conclusions and work backwards; but for any reader who is not woefully miseducated, enjoy.
More than 1,000 species are known to have gone extinct in just the last 400 years: http://www.conbio.org/resources/Education/faq.cfm
Also:
http://www.lassp.cornell.edu/newmme/scie...ction.html
An interesting book, if you're into that kind of thing: https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-revie...-bad-luck/
I know when 'Undeceived' says 'evidence' he means bodily show him millions of extinct species so he can count them himself, since he (despite his protests) despises scientists in the relevant fields and has been so misled by Creation Science that he thinks all scientists start with their conclusions and work backwards; but for any reader who is not woefully miseducated, enjoy.
