RE: Atheism is a religion
February 4, 2012 at 3:11 am
(This post was last modified: February 4, 2012 at 3:14 am by Undeceived.)
(February 3, 2012 at 12:58 pm)Stimbo Wrote: For someone who is "Convinced of Christ by science", Deceived sure spends a lot of time trying to convince us that science is false. Only the inconvenient bits of course.
The majority of my posts are about why evolution isn't science. I support real science one hundred percent. But if evolution has not been observed, tested or demonstrated it has not followed the scientific method. I don't know how you dare argue otherwise. I'm not saying the theory is beyond-a-doubt false-- just that we should treat it like the belief system it is. Evolution has no direct evidence. Scientists attribute this to the majority of the action being in the past. But if you assume the earth is billions+ years old, you've already broken objectivity. Evolution does not function without dating. If dating goes down, everything else is able to be explained away by a creator. My problem is that this vitalest of vital evidences is based on the assumption of the earth being old, that this means circular theory, and that evolutionists feel the need to deny it is circular theory. Such deception should not be overlooked. I trust science, but I distrust scientists when they propagandize for evolution. The evidence should be left to speak for itself. If all you can do is infer you might as well be a skeptic until more information turns up. Jumping to conclusions to bolster one's atheistic belief is not science at all--it's sacrilege to the field.