(February 6, 2012 at 11:04 am)chipan Wrote: we're talking about good and evil and i can say that good and evil are opposites with 100% accuracy. do you disagree?
Yep. Good and evil are descriptive terms. You must lay out an ethical system that uses them and define your terms before you can even have a discussion about them. And before you start screeching about relative morality at me, that is not at all what I am talking about. You must go through the labor of semantics before you can start using good and evil in such specific terms as "opposites with 100% accuracy." By saying that you have removed their inherent generality without replacing it with any detail.