(March 3, 2012 at 8:17 pm)Stimbo Wrote: It's an old response to an equally old question, but any god worthy of the appellation would already know what evidence would convince. That such evidence has not been forthcoming we should conclude - what? That the god/s do not want to convince? That non-accepters have been blinded to the evidence which so convinces the faithful (this alone opens up a whole new raft of questions)? Or perhaps that there is/are no god/s available for the experiment?
It may be an old response but it is nonetheless a good one. I agree with all that I've copied. (I rarely put much faith in Occam's razor. It is a rule of thumb only and is easily misapplied. It isn't persuasive so why bother?)
