RE: 'Intelligent' design?
March 11, 2012 at 10:42 pm
(This post was last modified: March 11, 2012 at 10:43 pm by black36.)
(March 11, 2012 at 10:36 pm)Insanity x Wrote:(March 11, 2012 at 10:29 pm)black36 Wrote: Rhythm, just as I can recognize that your post was designed, based on its specified complexity, I can then theorize that it was designed. The same goes for scenarios in the natural realm.
No its a hypothesis because you can't test or prove the assertion. I recognize you are not understanding the difference between Hypothesis and Theory so I hypothesize you are and idiot. Get it?
Where did you get the idea that ID is just an assertion?
(March 11, 2012 at 10:39 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You are wrong to "theorize" that you can make this observation without any reference to the design or designer. Isn't that what you claim that ID does? Well, it doesn't, and neither do you. So, in this case, yes, my "no" is a checkmate. Can't win them all.
Ok, you win. Your post was not intelligently designed.
