Bible contradictions?

[DeistPaladin]

Only changes within a species, no changes from one species to another have ever shown up in the fossil records.

One word: dogs.

Dogs, GC.

Dogs are a separate species from wolves.

Dogs were bred from wolves.

Dogs are an example of how one species can come from another.

And this is within relatively recent human history. That they can be bred through artificial means it can happen in nature.

The fossil records show only fully developed species, no transitional ones,

What do you imagine a "transitional species" would look like? How would a "transitional species" be different from a "species"? What is to stop a Creationist from playing infinite regression, where you'll keep demanding to see transitions between transitions? Say, if we find a transition between Homo Erectus and Neanderthal, would you then ask for a transition between this transition?

and this is a troubling fact for many evolutionist, even though, they do not give up on evolution.

I'm curious and no Creationist has ever answered this question: do you believe there's a conspiracy then?

This is an elaborate conspiracy. It's been going strong for 100 years now, it's taken over the scientific and academic fields. It's sabotaged the entire process of peer review. It has a strong hold across all national borders all over the world. That's an impressive conspiracy! Why?

What's the motive? Is there a lot of money to be made?

So yes life is static as far as we know.

What about the three examples that every child knows about that I cited?