Bible contradictions?

[chi pan]

Dogs have been around for more than a few hundred years but the breeding of wolves into dogs (separate species) shows that speciation is possible (contrary to ID proponents assertions, that microevolution happens but there is some sort of barrier that prevents speciation or macroevolution).

Agreed that speciation is possible and does not take millions of years. However, it is one thing to say all dogs have a common ancestor and then to say everything has a common ancestor.

Evolution does not feature dramatic changes at all. Dramatic changes, like a horse giving birth to a giraffe, would disprove evolution and be evidence for a supernatural influence.

Did you read the quote I posted? I said a transitional form would show gradual NOT dramatic change. Saying all fossils are transitional fossils is clearly pointing out how nothing will convince you evolution is wrong. You pretty much said life exists therefore evolution is true as if that is significant. Delusional.

There is none. Again, that would disprove evolution.

Think wolf to dog. Even though that was artificial selection, the same process is at work.

The difference with wolves and dogs is according to the widely accepted definition of species (animals that can interbreed) they are the same species. Dogs can breed with wolves to get half wolf dogs. We can see it and observe and study it so it's science.

You don't just need to assert a conspiracy here. You need to assert the BIGGEST CONSPIRACY OF ALL TIME AND A VAST INTERNATIONAL ILLUMINATI STYLE ORGANIZATION BEHIND IT!

Then you would need even more evidence to to claim conspiracy for things like Jesus never existed as a person then I would to say evolution is a conspiracy according to what you said. It's been accepted longer and by more people than evolution has. I would say a very low percent of people claim Jesus never existed.

As frauds successfully exposed by the rigorous process of peer review proving that science can be relied upon to factor in all available evidence and discard what turns out not to be true.

I would give then credit for that if it weren't for a few things. First, we aren't talking about oops, I made a mistake. We are talking about scientists lying through their teeth. They take a man skull and ape jaw and call it piltdown man and present it as evidence. It wasn't proven wrong for 20 years. Some process. Nebraska man was made up from a single tooth. It was big in the day but now of course they try to forget it. A single tooth was taken to say we found a missing link and it turned out not even to be human or ape but a pigs tooth. That's your great scientific process? Something is wrong.

Really? Source please?

I gave examples didn't I? I didn't even bring up java man, made of 3 teeth, a leg bone and a skull fragment found miles apart from one another. I named the hoaxes what else do you want as evidence?