(March 19, 2012 at 4:02 pm)StatCrux Wrote:(March 19, 2012 at 3:56 pm)NoMoreFaith Wrote: So you don't mind if they have a religious civil partnership in a more tolerant church then?
A while ago you were dead against it, and wanted them to be banned from having a religious ceremony in a quaker or unitarianist church.
If it remains a civil partnership and some other Church wishes to perform a religious ceremony without it being recognised as a marriage then why not? sure. That wouldn't affect the institution of marriage and would be a good compromise.
Right. Because you know, the seats at the back of the bus are just as good as the ones in the front.