(March 19, 2012 at 6:00 pm)StatCrux Wrote: I understand your viewpoint, my argument is that marriage has always been understood as a union between a man and a woman
As has been demonstrated to you already in this thread, it has not always been the case, nor is it universal. Your own church had to formally define it some 600 odd years ago. Are you suggesting that prior to that, it was universally true that marriage was always a union between a man and a woman, regardless of faith, regardless of culture?
You can continue to call marriage whatever you want. The majority of us have moved past that.
