Can I make a very belated comment on this thread. Whilst my POV is pro natural when it comes to the nature of homosexuality, as I've stated before.
I'd absolutely agree if someone was being blatantly bigoted WITHOUT any reasoning offered they should be banned.
Anto was very agitated due to what he stated he felt was a personal racist attack.
I think that not answering Anto's explorative questioning and refutations leaves the discussion resting in favour of homosexuality = wrong. I have no idea why Anto was banned for a week, I was banned at the same time so couldn't access the shoutbox to see if he said something terrible there. Censorship here, if that's what it was, was counter productive IMO. that is.. Anti homosexuality was silenced without reason.
I'd absolutely agree if someone was being blatantly bigoted WITHOUT any reasoning offered they should be banned.
Anto was very agitated due to what he stated he felt was a personal racist attack.
I think that not answering Anto's explorative questioning and refutations leaves the discussion resting in favour of homosexuality = wrong. I have no idea why Anto was banned for a week, I was banned at the same time so couldn't access the shoutbox to see if he said something terrible there. Censorship here, if that's what it was, was counter productive IMO. that is.. Anti homosexuality was silenced without reason.
