Atheism leaves too much room for error.

[Kyuuketsuki]

And no one that I know of is saying there absolutely is no god, what we are saying is there is no validatable evidence for a god (no more evidence than for the thousands of others gods invented, apparently, by mankind or indeed for the facetious ones invented to ridicule the idea) and as such we will live our lives as if there is none because (in our view) it is stupid to do otherwise. IN essence YOU have to prove the existence of your god BEFORE we will accept it to be so.

It's common knowledge that multiple gods cannot exist together, because "God" is the highest title known to man. How could there be several gods? That's like the United States having several Presidents. The Egyptians worshipped the Sun. We know the Sun is not a god. The Sumerians used to worship the Moon. We know the Moon is not a god. Science has debunked literally every ancient religion that predates Judaism/Christianity/Islam. The reason why these three religions rule the earth is because they cannot be refuted. It's virtually impossible to refute a supernatural deity.

Common knowledge eh? Try telling that to the Norsemen, the Aztecs, the Romans, the Greeks, the Indians, the Egyptians (they actually had many gods despite the efforts of one of their pharaohs to unite them under his favourite) as well as quite a number of current day religions.

Actually they can be refuted ... they refute each other both at the major cult level and within themselves as cults and in 1995 something like 15% of the world's population were atheist (non believer). What's that? Near 1 billion people ... that's one helluva lot of people to ignore making a statement like that and beside, you just using the fallacious argument, "argumentum ad populum" (argument from popularity). If 5 billion people believe 2 + 2 was 5 would it be true? If 5 billion people believed the sex of a rabbit was male without actually figuring it out would that affect the outcome when relevant observations were made?

Rubbish ... you have a book written by a technological primitive people, it is not and never will be a science book. I'll consider accepting that your bible got it right WHEN (and only when) you demonstrate that your bible describes evolution, DNA, the periodic table, cosmology, rocket science, plate tectonics, gravity, geology, oceanography, quantum mechanics and more besides ... and before you go, "ah but... " let me make it plain ... I mean IN DETAIL (all of known science probably equates to several hundred extremely large libraries, your bible is ONE book).

The words, Evolution and rocket science didn't exist 3000 years ago. How do you expect a group of men to mention words that do not exist? Evolution is a modern term for the adaption of the enviroment. As for DNA, I do believe the bible says "there is life within blood".

I DON'T FUCKING CARE!

IF YOUR GOD WANTED TO SPREAD A SCIENTIFIC MESSAGE IN ITS BOOK OF SCRIPTURES IT WOULD HAVE MADE SURE IT WAS DAMNED WELL FUCKING ACCURATE AND ITS PEOPLE COULD FUCKING WELL UNDERSTAND IT BUT IT DIDN'T!

OOPS BIG FUCK UP! IF YOUR GOD IS REAL, IT'S A SERIOUS FUCKING TOSSER!!!!!

And you are INTERPRETING ... what the hell makes YOUR interpretation of your bible right and not mine? You interpret it as everything, I interpret it as an historic source and nothing more. You CANNOT prove you are right!

I'm not here to prove I'm right. I never said that. However, I am showing Bible verses that modern science agrees with.

They don't and only a moron would claim the bible is anything much other that a technological primitive culture's view of their universe and their gods!

The bible is not now and never will be science ... grow up!

I never claimed the bible is a science book. Trust me, if God wanted to mention helium, gravity, energy and geology, he would have done so, but the people of that time era wouldn't have understood him.

"People will run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased" - Daniel 12:4

You've implied it ... Luke, Luke ... the disingenuousness runs strong in this one!

So fucking what? I claim I invented the nuclear bomb ... my claim is stronger than your god's ... at least I can be proven to exist!

Well, if you wrote a book 3,000 years ago talking about Nuclear bombs, and 3,000 years later, mankind invents the nuclear bomb, then I would have to take your word for it.

Don't be an arse ... it wouldn't have gotten written 3000 years ago, the cultures then lacked the relevant technological expertise!

Then your bible is NOT science ... don't you get it yet? Learn some science!

I know about science. But science does not disprove God in any way. So, when you say, "Learn science", you are giving me the indication that the knowledge from science confirms there is no God. Untrue, and baseless claims.

Science has found no (ZERO, NADA, ZIP) evidence for your god or any other. No currently accepted scientific explanation requests or requires the action of your god or any other. The rational assumption is that any new scientific explanation will be naturalistic and will not refer to the action of your god or any other. That means that the assumption for all scientific explanations is by default naturalistic and that any evidence required to advance an explanation involving your god or any other requires extraordinary evidence ... therefore, whilst I agree that science is currently unable to confirm or deny the existence of your god (or any other), the actual probability is rather more heavily weighted in favour of their not being one than you'd like to pretend.

If your god said Tyre would never be rebuilt why does it exist now?

The ancient ruins of Tyre are underground. It was never rebuilt, as promised by God. Today "Sur" is on the land where Tyre once stood.

Wrong, it is still the city of Tyre and is ALSO called Sour, it exists in the same place as the original Tyre and in fact has expanded ... IOW you're talking bollocks (again)!

An ancient being for which there is no fucking validatable evidence ... as far as any objective observer can tell, your god is fiction!

This is false since you cannot prove a universal negative. When you say God is fiction, all you are doing is speaking your opinion. Nothing more, nothing less. You can claim God is fiction all day long, but that doesn't mean you're right. That shows that you have an opinion about the existence of God.

As you say, it was (quite clearly) my opinion but the fact remains there IS NO VALIDATABLE EVIDENCE FOR YOUR GOD OR ANY OTHER therefore, as far as anyone objective can tell, your god is just plain fiction.

"We have no clue what mysterious force moves our constellations" - Albert Einstein

Now, before you get all defensive on me... I'm not claiming Einstein was Christian, but what I can prove is that even the world's most brilliant minds have no idea what mysterious force is beyond our grasp.

Where EXACTLY, did you get that quote from because it seems to me you think that's significant and so would every other whacko theist? I did a search and I can't even find the fucking quote never mind it being attributed to Einstein.

It looks like the actual quote was (in full), "We see a universe marvellously arranged and obeying certain laws, but only dimly understand those laws. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that moves the constellations." Which is a significantly different quote from the version you posted ... more theist disingenuousness I think?

Kyu