RE: Atheism leaves too much room for error.
August 20, 2009 at 7:56 pm
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2009 at 8:29 pm by theVOID.)
According to google:
No results found for "We have no clue what mysterious force moves our constellations".
You douchebag, stop making shit up.
So what, you're imaginary friend should have known everything there ever was to know right? So he's got no excuse for not making this stuff known. As Woody Allen said: "If it turns out that there is a God, I don't think that he's evil. But the worst that you can say about him is that basically he's an underachiever"
Bullshit, you're saying your all powerful being was incapable of conveying this information to his people? Doesn't sound very 'all powerful' to me. Sounds more like primitive sand dwellers wrote a book containing their summation of knowledge, which was comparatively fuck all.
It can't disprove unicorns, fairies, dragons, the FSM and whatever imaginary being you want to drop into this line either. What it all boils down to is your God (aka Magic Man) is as equally unlikely as anything else in this category and if you think otherwise you're a quack. You need EVIDENCE to distinguish between fact and fiction, and in the case of god none exists, no matter how many concepts you want to attribute to him. Your god is a completely unfounded assumption that you stupidly assert as fact time and time again.
Answer me this question, can you name one single thing that can successfully distinguish your god from nothing?
Really? find me one example of God that exists outside of fiction! Here's a clue: There is fucking nothing! Now what do you think is the more appropriate conclusion? that the unprovable assumption is asserted as truth or that unprovable assumption is ignored until it can be distinguished from nothing?
No results found for "We have no clue what mysterious force moves our constellations".
You douchebag, stop making shit up.
Quote:The words, Evolution and rocket science didn't exist 3000 years ago. How do you expect a group of men to mention words that do not exist? Evolution is a modern term for the adaption of the enviroment. As for DNA, I do believe the bible says "there is life within blood".
So what, you're imaginary friend should have known everything there ever was to know right? So he's got no excuse for not making this stuff known. As Woody Allen said: "If it turns out that there is a God, I don't think that he's evil. But the worst that you can say about him is that basically he's an underachiever"
Quote:I never claimed the bible is a science book. Trust me, if God wanted to mention helium, gravity, energy and geology, he would have done so, but the people of that time era wouldn't have understood him
Bullshit, you're saying your all powerful being was incapable of conveying this information to his people? Doesn't sound very 'all powerful' to me. Sounds more like primitive sand dwellers wrote a book containing their summation of knowledge, which was comparatively fuck all.
Quote:I know about science. But science does not disprove God in any way. So, when you say, "Learn science", you are giving me the indication that the knowledge from science confirms there is no God. Untrue, and baseless claims.
It can't disprove unicorns, fairies, dragons, the FSM and whatever imaginary being you want to drop into this line either. What it all boils down to is your God (aka Magic Man) is as equally unlikely as anything else in this category and if you think otherwise you're a quack. You need EVIDENCE to distinguish between fact and fiction, and in the case of god none exists, no matter how many concepts you want to attribute to him. Your god is a completely unfounded assumption that you stupidly assert as fact time and time again.
Answer me this question, can you name one single thing that can successfully distinguish your god from nothing?
Quote:This is false since you cannot prove a universal negative. When you say God is fiction, all you are doing is speaking your opinion. Nothing more, nothing less. You can claim God is fiction all day long, but that doesn't mean you're right. That shows that you have an opinion about the existence of God.
Really? find me one example of God that exists outside of fiction! Here's a clue: There is fucking nothing! Now what do you think is the more appropriate conclusion? that the unprovable assumption is asserted as truth or that unprovable assumption is ignored until it can be distinguished from nothing?
.
