RE: HOLY FUCKBALLS, BATMAN
April 17, 2012 at 9:17 pm
(This post was last modified: April 17, 2012 at 9:19 pm by King_Charles.)
Um, did you even read my post? In it I point out that the site had ALREADY been excavated, and that none of the evidence claimed to be new in that article is actually new... this is all stuff that has been in libraries for decades.
The article itself is interesting for its description of the moder state of the Samartians, and the evidence it cites is largely accurate, however the idea that any of it is in any way "new" is entirely wrong.
The article itself is interesting for its description of the moder state of the Samartians, and the evidence it cites is largely accurate, however the idea that any of it is in any way "new" is entirely wrong.
