I'm saying the criticism is rather invalid when it comes to 'costing more money to set up'. The cost of adjusting the tax code is too high to begin with and this scenario illustrates that perfectly.
If anything, it's not a criticism but a statement of fact.
And to it 'generating 11 hours of income', does that factor in the actual percolation of income throughout the entire budgetary structure, or is it some dumbass ball park figure derived from calculating the gross net income and comparing that against gross net operating costs of the government?
I'm not trusting of anything Mr. Romney claims.
If anything, it's not a criticism but a statement of fact.
And to it 'generating 11 hours of income', does that factor in the actual percolation of income throughout the entire budgetary structure, or is it some dumbass ball park figure derived from calculating the gross net income and comparing that against gross net operating costs of the government?
I'm not trusting of anything Mr. Romney claims.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
