(May 7, 2012 at 1:32 pm)Shell B Wrote: No, I do not attest to the love of god. I am contesting your biased interpretations of your own holy book. Nothing more, nothing less.How so?
Quote:Actually it does. My position is merely that you are wrong in your assessment.Then please restate your position.
Quote:A definition is reference material.Not without a being tied to a legitimate source. Otherwise it is just a definition.
Quote:As this source does not support your assessment, it upholds my position. You are redefining words to suit your needs.My position is that Agape is not a love that is free from terms or conditions. (as per John 3:16) One must adhere to said terms in order to receive the boundless nature of this form of Love that God is offering.
This point has been stated and restated a dozen times now, if you believe I am changing anything then go back and reread my previous posts.
Quote:Pity that you don't understand that literally everything you read is commentary. Whether it is based on facts or not is the crux of it.I have listed 3 actual reference books for the other person who wanted to argue this very same argument. At least that person and I were able to agree on the authority of what true reference material looks like. (wiki-p, random outlines in sociology and phantom definitions not being apart of the discussion.)
