RE: God does not love you...
May 9, 2012 at 2:38 pm
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2012 at 2:39 pm by Drich.)
(May 9, 2012 at 1:53 pm)RaphielDrake Wrote: 2. So you're saying Peter didn't love him completely?No that is not what I said. For I do not know what "Complete love" is, so i would not use that term.
What I did say is that all the gospels tell us that Peter had a strong relationship with Christ upto that point where He faltered, as such he was well covered under the Agape Christ offers.(Because of the existing relationship.) Which means even though peter had a moment of weakness Grace was extended to him because once Covered by Agape that love is limitless.
Quote:Why on earth are you using it as an example then. What *would* support Boundless Agape is if Peter wasn't written as denying him in the first place there by placing his life in danger for the sake of his friend.Remember We do not have to offer Agape it is God who offers it to us. The verses from the end of the book of John prove. We know from that example, Peter's fullest expression of love results in Philia, yet he received Agape from Christ.
Quote:I find it alittle odd you wouldn't pick up on that but then what can I expect from a fundamentalists interpretation of love?Because you did not take the time to fully understand what it is you are arguing against.
Quote:5. A Christian misrepresenting someone words, shocking. Also rather sad you can't see the irony in that last statement.

How did you last post start?
"Drich's Guide to a good argument" If I am not mistaken.
The smile

That is unless you need a complete explanation and run down of each time I use that emoticon.
