God does not love you...

[Gambit]

---

Let me just end this all right here and now.

with a series of questions???

How come all these interpretations and explanations are always counter arguments to the fallacies found in the bible?

I'm not sure what you mean by fallacies found in the bible. But, if your asking why is the bible used to answer biblically based questions, I should hope the answer is obvious.

So, all those true Christians who preached a completely different angle were wrong, right?

We are all wrong to a degree so yes.

Which would mean that any of those Christians who have passed away are now in hell, right?

No not necessarily, because being 100% "right" is not a prerequisite of salvation unless you hold others to that standard yourself.

Providing answers after the contradiction is sound reasoning, right?

Begs the question.

Incidentally, there are Christian apologists who claim that the words in the bible, which refer to homosexual sex, are actually misinterpretations of the word rape.

does not matter because Homosexuality is described in several different way, all of which are still defined as being a sin.

So, gay marriage is all good, right? Right,.

Again no because even if you remove or choose to ignore all the instances that directly describe Homosexuality as being a sin you still do not have a command or precedent allowing for same sex marriage. Now because all sex outside the covenant of marriage (even the thought of it) is a sin. Homosexuality is still considered a sin.

I get it now

Glad to be of service.

---

And your modern, updated version of these translations is right, why? You miserably failed to address any of my points. Which, may I add, were all blatantly clear to anyone who can question the validity of a previous assertion, and then, compare it to a new assertion. So, let's start again. You show me yours (Translations which support your argument) and I'll show you mine (Translations which support my argument).