(May 10, 2012 at 7:32 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: No, I do not mean it like the love for a possession. If I maintain that my car is an individual, and want to get married to it, I should be able to, yes?
If your car can:
- Feel pain
- logically articulate self-generated desires, goals, plans
- feel an attraction for/longing for another car and is capable of receiving the same
Then you'd have a point.
But you don't.
Comparing a human being to a car is the laziest form of bullshittery, Mehm. Can't you even be arsed to try something much, much more similar?
How about something that is alive and thus has the qualifier of 'living' and human-level intellect?
(May 10, 2012 at 7:32 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Marriage is not your or my toy to play with it. Gays cannot change things they way they want to.
North Carolina 'played' with Marriage. They decided to speak for everyone who has done a marriage in their state, and perhaps, have attempted to speak for others.
So much for a 'toy' to play with. It very much is open to political monkey wrenching.
And as to "Gays cannot change things":
Courageous men and women worked to end slavery. So much for "abolitionists cannot change things"...
Slave to the Patriarchy no more