(May 12, 2012 at 9:16 am)Matt231 Wrote:(May 12, 2012 at 9:11 am)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Well, if you don't call it a marriage, it's not a marriage.It's the same idea though. Changing the name doesn't change the concept. You spent the last few days saying that gay marriage is wrong and that we should abort them as babies. And now you're saying it's right, as long as we change the name? It makes no difference.
I've explained that it's not. You've not been paying attention to my posts.
As you obviously cannot comprehend that marriage is something beyond the legal contract, you can easily speak of a marriage that does not carry the burden of a marriage a marriage.
Whether the people who get married can bear this burden or not, it's up to them.
Obviously, homosexuals were never actually entrusted with carrying this burden, as it was evident that they could not, even if they wanted to.
This is why marriage was exclusively between a man and a woman.
That is the nature of marriage.
I'm not suggesting that you should perfom a name change. I'm suggesting a seperate existence.
One that grants legal rights. But the burden of marriage, one that endorses traditional familial values, producing and raising of children is exclusive to normal members of society. It has always been.
This is my final take. I've explained about all that I can or should.
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?