(May 13, 2012 at 11:36 am)StatCrux Wrote: How is your form of morality objective? I don't think you're getting this? Your criteria for "facts" is in itself just a set of beliefs about "facts" how do you know your criteria is correct for determining "facts" without reference to some other accepted truths/beliefs about reality you can't. You can't prove logic with logic, its just accepted, the same is true of God, a self evident first principle.
You are the one not getting it. The correct criteria for determining facts are the undeniable axioms of reality. They are undeniable because even in the process of denying them, you have to accept them as true. They are accepted because without accepting them, there can be no such things as facts or truth or proof or belief. Your god is not of of those axioms, he is not self-evident and, in fact, he is illogical an contra-factual.
