RE: Same sex marriage
May 13, 2012 at 5:13 pm
(This post was last modified: May 13, 2012 at 5:15 pm by StatCrux.)
(May 13, 2012 at 5:06 pm)Gooders1002 Wrote:(May 13, 2012 at 4:57 pm)StatCrux Wrote: Yes but how is male and female defined if people with XY chromosomes can be women, or are they still male, are you saying they are neither male or female or somehow both?
Well technically they would be Women as that body and feature and inter working would be female only in the chromosomes would say there male but other then that they are female.
This really fucks up your whole anti-marriage argument, doesn't it.
So what is the definition of female? Please someone step up to the plate and give a difinition of female that is universally applicable with no exceptions, otherwise it is invalid according to genkaus
(May 13, 2012 at 5:05 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote:(May 13, 2012 at 4:27 pm)genkaus Wrote: Why yes, it would. Which is why we don't define men as "those who have a penis", nor do we define women as "those who have a vagina". Biologically, a male-to-female transsexual who has a vagina and breasts is still a man.
I was beaten to the punch...
If personality is a part of biology... I am inclined to disagree.
And do I have to go into it again? I should make a thread. But I want to wait like 5-8 months first!
What is your definition of male and female then? Remember they must be universally applicable with no exceptions in order to be valid, according to genkaus' reasoning.
