Same sex marriage

[StatCrux]

Let's examine our debate so far and see how your position has been falling apart as you still cling to it. Let's pay particular attention to all the arguments you could not reply to and chose to ignore - as if if you ignored them, they'd cease to exist.

1. On the question of proving god's axiomicity - ignored.
2. The third gender argument for a better classification of human genders - ignored.
3. Question of why the exceptions would not invalidate the rule - ignored and the statement simply repeated
4. Distinction between potential and principle - ignored.
5. The question of accepting that we are using the wrong criteria while we figure out the correct one - ignored.
6. The question of correction upon discovery of the correct criteria -ignored.
7. The question of if it is possible for you to correct your position - ignored.

What utter rubbish!
1.God is axiomatic, being the case its impossible to debate, its self evident.
2.There never was a gender issue, YOU didn't give any definitions of gender to base any discussion on, despite being asked to do so on numerous occasions.
3.Example given of the gym membership exception rule showing that the general rule is not invalidated by the exception
4.Potential and principal was distinguished, potential is actual, principal is possible within nature but not yet potential
5.criteria of general rules are not affected by extreme exceptions
6.You failed to give any examples of correct criteria regarding male and female definitions
7.I have no need to correct my position given your lack of addressing the problems.

I think you are under some delusion that your ignoring my responses and restating your opinion over again is in some way a substitute for discussion, even worse you think you're winning the debate that you have refused to engage. Ignoring responses and restating your opinion is not discussion.

In fact lets be specific on a point. 2. The gender argument, as you say. What exactly is this gender argument you refer to? please provide quotes of me that demonstrate this "gender argument" I ask you for definitions of gender and you don't provide them.