Same sex marriage

[StatCrux]

No, you moron, the discovery in question is the better criteria. That is the discovery that has not been made. The discovery does not refer to the "exceptions", but to the explanation of those exceptions. Can you understand that? What I ma actually saying is "well there's this kinda definition that we use but it's not completely correct really, but I cannot give you the correct one and that is the best we've got."

And as far as answering the question goes, it seems you have completely ignored the axiomicity of god and your principle-potential fallacy. I guess I'll take it as you conceding those arguments.

Give me strength.....The better criteria is what you are consistently failing to provide! Get it? Given our understanding of sexuality NOW why don't you tell me the better criteria if the present one is incorrect (as you are admitting) Basically you are saying our present criteria is wrong but have nothing better to offer. Are you admitting that we use criteria even though there may be exceptions? That's what it sounds like to me, which is what I've been saying from the start!

As to the other questions, as I've already stated, stay on track, this tactic of bouncing off topic onto a hundred questions then circling round from one to another doesn't wash!