(May 14, 2012 at 8:45 am)StatCrux Wrote:(May 14, 2012 at 7:53 am)genkaus Wrote: Is it? I mean, if the scientists can combine two eggs to produce a daughter mouse, it'd seem that same-sex unions can be procreative in principle.
Yes if your definition of union is external tampering by scientists....more of an unholy fusion I would say..
(May 14, 2012 at 8:24 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Our present criteria is fine Stat, it is yours that is completely fucked up.
Oh dear...This is hard work..It's Genkaus that says the criteria is incorrect.
It's only hard work because you're no longer allowed to have us burnt at the stake for hearesy.
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.