Same sex marriage

[Zen Badger]

Don't forget;

Rule: The purpose of Marriage is to make babies

Exception: none

If you reject that rule, I don't see how you have any rational objection to gay marriage. Whether they can have babies in principal or not, you ignore the issue that people don't get married to make babies.

I do eject that rule, that has never been my position. I say marriage is defined in part not only as a union open to to procreation of offspring in principal. Any union not open to procreation in principal is therefore not a marriage. Infertile couples (male/female) are still in principal procreative even if not in actuality.

Your position might've been fine for the 14th century but it's the 21st now.

You're a tad obsolete.

As is the outdated archaic institution which you cleave unto.