RE: Same sex marriage
May 14, 2012 at 11:14 am
(This post was last modified: May 14, 2012 at 11:15 am by genkaus.)
(May 14, 2012 at 10:45 am)StatCrux Wrote:(May 14, 2012 at 10:31 am)genkaus Wrote: If only reality could be determined by simple agreement.
Gay couples already have equal rights in law regarding same sex relationships in the UK, why do they feel the need for it to be called marriage? This isn't about equality it's about redefining the current definition of marriage.
Here are two ways in which they are not the same.
Quote:Any practical differences in the ceremonies?
Until now it has been banned for civil partnership ceremonies to include religious readings, music or symbols and forbidden for them to take place in religious venues, regardless of the views of the building's owners. In Scotland, which has its own legislation, some church parishes offer blessing ceremonies for same-sex couples.
Any other practical differences?
Civil partners of male peers or knights do not receive a courtesy title to which the spouse of a peer or knight would be entitled.
My question to you though, is that if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, why do you insist on calling it a non-duck?