(May 20, 2012 at 6:23 pm)Ben Davis Wrote:(May 20, 2012 at 2:09 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Only if they really were a "race" themselves, they would have looked rather reasonable in my eyes.
...and to spell out the point,for StarCrux & mehmet's benefit is that racism & sexism are not being battled by new legal definitions of race or gender but by ending the hypocrisy with which legislation is formulated. A stronger argument for the end of 'legal' marriage has never been made.
StarCrux, there's no slippery slope here, just equal rights to all consenting adults.
kılıç_mehmet, the battle against racism is an anaolgy. The point is the battle for equal civil rights.
Well, civil rights is another thing. I do not oppose the right of people of two different races being together. I just oppose the concept for my own people. I'm sure there are a lot of people who do the same.
Quote:It seems to me that telling people what they can and cannot do with their sexual organs with another consenting person is entirely stupid, leave the homosexuals be, I intend to be married soon and I don't see it as a union before god so I don't think it can be fair to impose on others your own view of a certain ceremony. If i was told that, in being an atheist, I was not allowed a wedding I'd be fucked off, it's not in the rights of others to usurp that decision.As I said, marriage in my country is always a secular institution and is done by civil servants. Yet it's still marriage.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?